Diff: [root] @ aecb2b71d29 | faq | css

*

File: git-sucks [Diff]

diff --git a/git-sucks b/git-sucks
index 49d4937..baec0ef 100644
-- a/git-sucks
++ b/git-sucks
@@ -3,31 +3,40 @@ __This article about git is a stub. You can help -Wikipe- Bitcheese.net project
bq. git - the stupid content tracker
__man git__

All content below is my small individual experiense of using version control systems. It provides only "for you information".

h1. Git Sucks

* where git sucks

h2. Git is stupid stupid, but overmuch difficult

* compare with darcs and camp VCS
* something about patch theory

h2. Git is overmuch difficult

h2. Git is feeble

* about reverting old commits

@git diff <commit>..<commit>^ <file> | git apply -@

* about

h3. About working with individual alterations at the same file

...

h1. Git Rocks

* where git rocks
* working

h2. Working with branches
* perfomance. Some benchmarks here
*

...

h2. Prefomance

"Benchmarks say":http://git.or.cz/gitwiki/GitBenchmarks what git is faster than another VCS on some operations. Well, it may be important if... Hm, I think I'll want to write about mercurial here because python soft sucks everything don't know.

h2. Git vs CVS vs SVN vs Mercurial vs Bazaar

And don't think what CVS, SVN, mercurial or bazaar is better than git. It's not truth, these version control systems are much worse. You can read about it below.

@@ -38,3 +47,4 @@ h1. Links
* "Darcs's patch theory on official manual":http://darcs.net/manual/node9.html
* "Darcs's patch theory on wikibooks":http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Understanding_darcs/Patch_theory — there are more images here
* "Bazaar vs Git":http://bazaar-vcs.org/BzrVsGit — humoristic work by ubuntu creators
* "Cutting Edge Revision Control":http://bryan-murdock.blogspot.com/2007/03/cutting-edge-revision-control.html — there is small benchmark here too

By Alexander Markov on 2009-06-05 18:54:04 +0400 Powered by bitcheese wiki engine